Scheduling Progress
Loading tasks...

Coach's Notes - Marquette High School

Marquette High School
Submitted: April 03, 2026 at 03:13 AM
Survey / ranking
Ranking opinion (poll tier):

Top 20

Season label:

2026-27

Home playing surface:

FieldTurf (Long-pile/Rubber-crumb)

Best performance surface:

FieldTurf (Long-pile/Rubber-crumb)

Submitted (survey):

February 24, 2026

Team Assessment
Strongest Teams:

SJA, JBS, MICDS, Villa, Ladue

Wish to Play Every Year:

Parkway West, Lafayette, Summit, MICDS, Westminster

Teams Most Like Yours:

Lafayette, Summit, Westminster, Kirkwood

Teams Deserving Better Schedule:

That’s hard. More competitive doesn’t mean playing all top teams. It means a playing teams to your ability level. Teams that fall in the 12-16 ranking always get a super competitive schedule that isn’t better when you continually lose 4 or 5 to 0. Same as the bottom 5 teams.

Player Assessment
Strongest Players:

Public school, that is a toss up year to year.

Promising Freshman:

Not sure.

Injuries/Departures:

Not that I know of.

Club Players:

For sure 1 at high level club. Not sure of others.

Multi-Sport Athletes:

About half.

System Feedback
Scheduling Factors:

Old school ranking where coaches opinions matter.

State Tournament Fairness:

No. I feel like having the later rounds always on water based turf isn’t fair for teams that never play on it. Two water based teams in the semi and finals great. But going from all season a field turf to having to try and play the quarterfinals on water based is hard.

Submission Details
School:
Marquette High School
Submitted:
April 03, 2026
03:13 AM
Last Updated:
April 03, 2026
03:13 AM
Privacy: This feedback is used internally to improve the ranking system and is not shared publicly.
How This Helps

Your feedback contributes to our reputation scoring system, helping validate coach perceptions against statistical data.

Used For:
  • Ranking algorithm improvements
  • Schedule optimization
  • Team strength validation
  • Tournament fairness assessment